Legal Opinion
Mathieu v. Norrell Corp.
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 19, 2004No. B159471PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PERLUSS, P. J.
Norrell Corporation, a temporary employment agency, 1 placed Laura M. Mathieu with its client Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation. Mathieu’s former boyfriend, Richard Fluck, was also employed by Gulf-stream. Once Mathieu began working at Gulfstream, Fluck taunted and harassed her and made it difficult for Mathieu to complete assignments.
After Mathieu’s position at Gulfstream was terminated, she brought suit against Fluck, Gulfstream and Norrell for sexual harassment and sexual discrimination in violation of the Fair Employment and Housing Act, Government Code section 12900…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Desert Palace, Inc. v. CostaSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Kerry Ellison v. Nicholas F. Brady, Secretary of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Rojo v. KligerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Romano v. Rockwell International, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1996
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Yanowitz v. L'OREAL USA, INC.California Supreme Court · 2005
- Garrett v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2013
- Bradley v. CAL. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATIONCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Jadwin v. County of KernDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2009
- Wassmann v. S. Orange Cnty. Cmty. Coll. Dist., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.