In re Application of Duke Energy Corp. & Progress Energy, Inc.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
McCullough, Judge.
Intervenors City of Orangeburg, South Carolina (“Orangeburg”) and N.C. Waste Awareness and Reduction Network (“NC WARN”) appeal from order of the N.C. Utilities Commission (the “Commission”) entered 29 June 2012. For the following reasons, we affirm the Commission’s order and dismiss Orangeburg’s appeal.
I. Background
In accordance with N.C. Gen. Stat. § 62-lll(a), on 4 April 2011, Duke Energy Corporation (“Duke”) and Progress Energy, Inc. (“Progress”) (collectively the “applicants”) submitted an application to the Commission for authorization to: “engage in a business…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Carolina Utility Customers Ass'n Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
- Hoisington v. ZT-Winston-Salem AssociatesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
- State ex rel. Utilities Comm'n v. Att'y Gen.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2013
- State Ex rel. Utilities Commission v. Carolina Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2005
- State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Carolina Utility Customers Ass'nCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sykes v. Health Network Solutions, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2019
- State of NC Ex. Rel. Utils. Comm'n v. Friesian HoldingsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022
- State of NC Ex. Rel. Utils. Comm'n v. Friesian HoldingsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022
- Sykes v. Health Network Solutions, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2019