Legal Opinion

Miller v. Railroad

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 12, 1901PublishedCited by 5 opinions

AottoN by W. W. Miller against tbe Wilmington and Powelsville Railroad Company, beard by Judge A. L. Coble and a jury, at September Term, 1900, of Beetie County Superior Court. From a judgment for tbe plaintiff, tbe defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtCook, J.

After introduction of plaintiff’s evidence, tbe defendant moved for judgment as in case of nonsuit under tbe statute, Acts 1891, cbap. 109, as amended by Acts 1899, chap. 131; motion refused and defendant excepted. Tben defendant introduced its evidence, and after all tbe evidence was in renewed its- motion, wbicb was again refused and defendant again excepted. There was a verdict and judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appealed.

Tbe contention of plaintiff is. that be was injured by tbe negligence of defendant in its reckless and careless handling of its engine and train of oars, at or near…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pleasants v. Raleigh & Augusta Air-Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
  2. Smith v. North Carolina R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1870
  3. Morgan v. Norfolk Southern RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
  4. Wallace v. Western North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
  5. Herring v. Wilmington & Raleigh Rail RoadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1849

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Nowell v. BasnightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  2. House v. Seaboard Air Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1902
  3. Nowell v. . BasnightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  4. State Hospital v. FountainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1901
  5. Ware v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API