Legal Opinion

State v. Figlenski

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 21, 1932No. 23659. Department TwoPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

The defendant, by information, was charged with the crime of unlawfully having in Ms possession, and carrying about with him, intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale; to which he pleaded not guilty. The trial resulted in a verdict of guilty. The defendant made a motion in arrest of judgment, and, in the alternative, for a new trial, both of which were overruled; and from the judgment and sentence entered upon the verdict, he appeals.

The facts, as they appear from the evidence offered by the state, may be summarized as follows: One Wayne Wyrick was the manager of a store at Omak, in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. ParkerWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  2. State v. PepoonWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  3. State v. AdamoWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  4. State v. PeckWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  5. State v. HurlbertWashington Supreme Court · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. ButtryWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  2. State v. KnappWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  3. State v. CummingsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982
  4. State v. SegarWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Vannoy v. Pacific Power & Light Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API