Legal Opinion

Chris. Schroeder & Son Co. v. Oeflein

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 1932PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFowler, J.

The recital clause of the contract of guaranty referred to in the statement of facts, and the only clause in the contract containing any words of guaranty, is as follows :

“Whereas second party (the company) is unwilling to take on said bond issues and handle the same unless third parties (Walter W. Oeflein, Robert A. Messmer, and Walter Schroeder) will personally, to the extent of one-third each, guarantee second party the performance by first party (Mastopietro) or his assigns, of all the terms of said bonds and trust mortgages so to be executed by him to second party, which said performance…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Skowhegan Water Co. v. Skowhegan Village Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1906
  2. Chandler Lumber Co. v. RadkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Callaway v. EvansonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Associates Financial Services Co. v. EisenbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  3. State Ex Rel. Department of Agriculture & Markets v. Badger Dairy, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Mashburn v. WilsonColorado Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Glenn v. Bradley Center Sports & Entertainment Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API