Legal Opinion

Walker v. City of Waterbury

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided April 3, 2006No. 3:04CV1477MRKPublished

1Opinion of the Court

RULING AND ORDER

KRAVITZ, District Judge.

Plaintiffs in this case are firefighters who allege that their employer, the City of Waterbury (“the City”), deprived them of their right to substantive due process and equal protection under the Fourteenth Amendment by altering the terms of their retirement benefits. They bring this lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, seeking money damages, attorneys’ fees, and costs as a result of the claimed violation of their constitutional rights. This case has been considered, though not formally consolidated, with Laccone v. City of Waterbury, 3:04-CV-2139 (MRK) and…

2Cases cited17 opinions

Land v. DollarSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
Williams v. FanningSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
United States v. John Frank RodgersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
Conntech Development Company v. University of Connecticut Education Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
Poole v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.