Legal Opinion

Edward J. A. Albrecht v. Louis Nelson

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 24, 1972No. 26635PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Albrecht, a California prisoner convicted of murder, appeals from the District Court’s denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The basis of Al-brecht’s petition was his claim that his guilty plea was involuntary because it was the product of coercion on the part of his trial counsel. The District Court conducted an evidentiary hearing, but it could find no merit to Albrecht’s contention. We affirm.

From the evidence adduced at the hearing, the District Court determined: (1) Albrecht was influenced; but not legally coerced, by his counsel, and (2) Al-brecht’s plea was primarily…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Parker v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Commodore William Moss v. Walter E. Craven, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
  5. Harry C. Knowles v. Clarence T. Gladden, Warden, Oregon State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Richard Bellew v. J. B. GunnCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
  2. James Burchett v. Harold J. Cardwell, Warden, Arizona State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
  3. Alfred Joseph Collins v. Warden Nevada State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API