Legal Opinion

Glymph v. CT Corporation Systems

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided January 22, 2025No. 2:21-cv-01704Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 LAFFON GLYMPH, CASE NO. 2:21-cv-01704-JHC 8 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR 9 Plaintiff, SUMMARY JUDGMENT 10 v. 11 CT CORPORATION SYSTEMS, and COMPUCOM SYSTEMS, INC., 12 13 Defendants. 14 I 15 INTRODUCTION 16 This matter comes before the Court on Defendant CompuCom Systems. Inc.’s Motion for 17 Summary Judgment. Dkt. # 95. CompuCom employed pro se Plaintiff Laffon Glymph. 18 Glymph took a one-month leave in 2018 under the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), 29

19 U.S.C. § 2601

and Washington Family Leave Act (WFLA),…

2Cases cited22 opinions

Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
Reloynne K. Villiarimo Joseph Harvest v. Aloha Island Air, Inc., Dba Island Air Rosie Nenezich Richard HeeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
Penny Bachelder Mark Bachelder v. America West Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
Grimsby v. SamsonWashington Supreme Court · 1975

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.