Legal Opinion
City of Indianapolis v. Armour
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided December 18, 2009No. 49A02-0901-CV-84PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NAJAM, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE 1
In this appeal, we are asked to determine whether a resolution ("the Resolution") passed by the Indianapolis Board of Public Works ("the Board") violates the Equal Protection Clause of the United States Constitution, as applied to forty-five property owners in Northern Estates, an Indianapolis neighborhood ("the Homeowners"). The Resolution was designed to move the City of Indianapolis (the "City") from the Barrett Law method of financing sewer projects to a different method under the Septic Tank Elimination Program ("STEP"). The Resolution forgave…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Nordlinger v. HahnSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Engquist v. Oregon Department of AgricultureSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Allied Stores of Ohio, Inc. v. BowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Sioux City Bridge Co. v. Dakota CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1923
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Armour v. City of IndianapolisSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- City of Indianapolis v. ArmourIndiana Supreme Court · 2011
- Associated Builders & Contractors, E. Pa. Chapter, Inc. v. Cnty. of NorthamptonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
- Armour v. City of IndianapolisSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- City of Indianapolis v. ArmourIndiana Supreme Court · 2011