State v. Lawrence
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Leben, J.:
The district court dismissed criminal charges against Kayle Lawrence because the trial setting was 313 days after arraignment and thus violated a statutory 180-day deadline. But delays that are “as a result of the application or fault of the defendant” do not count against the deadline under the statute. See K.S.A. 2006 Supp. 22-3402(2). We must decide whether enough of those 313 days do not count so that the 180-day deadline had not been exceeded. The largest single delay, 131 days, was caused by the defendant waiting to ask for a jury trial until about a week before a non-jury…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. TimleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
- State v. AdamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
- State v. FinkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1975
- State v. RiveraSupreme Court of Kansas · 2004
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. PenningtonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2010
- State v. TrassSupreme Court of Kansas · 2024
- State v. ElnickiCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2010
- State v. BryantCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2008
- State v. GrubbCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2020