Legal Opinion

State v. Lawrence

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided September 21, 2007No. 96,104PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Leben, J.:

The district court dismissed criminal charges against Kayle Lawrence because the trial setting was 313 days after arraignment and thus violated a statutory 180-day deadline. But delays that are “as a result of the application or fault of the defendant” do not count against the deadline under the statute. See K.S.A. 2006 Supp. 22-3402(2). We must decide whether enough of those 313 days do not count so that the 180-day deadline had not been exceeded. The largest single delay, 131 days, was caused by the defendant waiting to ask for a jury trial until about a week before a non-jury…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. TimleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
  2. State v. AdamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  3. State v. FinkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1975
  4. State v. RiveraSupreme Court of Kansas · 2004
  5. State v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. PenningtonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2010
  2. State v. TrassSupreme Court of Kansas · 2024
  3. State v. ElnickiCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2010
  4. State v. BryantCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2008
  5. State v. GrubbCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API