Legal Opinion

Adamson v. Fogelstrom

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 5, 1927PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

* Corpus Juris-Cyc References: Attachment, 6CJ, section 22, p. 40, n. 86; Chattel Mortgages, 11CJ, section 1, p. 399, n. 3; section 33, p. 425, n. 10; section 338, p. 623, n. 19; section 339, p. 624, n. 35; Evidence, 22CJ, section 87, p. 151, n. 95; 23CJ, section 1950, p. 133, n. 30. This is a suit by respondent, Adamson, against defendant Fogelstrom, seeking recovery on an account for labor performed by respondent and others, with attachment in aid and W.M. Leitch Sheep Commission Company was summoned as garnishee. The suit originated in the justice court of Jackson county where plaintiff…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Mathieson v. St. Louis & San Francisco RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  2. Coleman v. LucksingerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  3. Bryson & Hardin v. PenixSupreme Court of Missouri · 1853
  4. Newsum v. HoffmanTennessee Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Hall v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1909

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Yellow Mfg. Accept. Corp. v. Rogers and SchoolerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1940
  2. Capitol Stores, Inc. v. Storms-Green Construction Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1961
  3. Midwestern Machinery Co. v. ParsonsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1964
  4. Cunningham v. G. F. C. Corp.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1951
  5. State Ex Rel. Cantley v. AkinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API