Legal Opinion

Ramsey v. Randall

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1873PublishedCited by 2 opinions

From the Marion Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtDowney, C. J.

There are no questions presented by the assignment of errors in this case, except such as should have been stated as reasons for a new trial. The overruling of the motion for a new trial is not assigned as error. The case is like the case of Cole v. Burris, 38 Ind. 168; and for the reasons there stated the judgment must be affirmed. See Tyner v. Adams, 34 Ind. 401.

Judgment affirmed, with five' per cent, damages and costs.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Tyner v. AdamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1870
  2. Cole v. BurrisIndiana Supreme Court · 1871

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rothrock v. PerkinsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Keys v. TingleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1875