Legal Opinion

Fritts v. Liddle & Moeller Construction, Inc.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 2007No. 32089PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TROUT, Justice.

Homeowners Steve and Paula Fritts (collectively, the Frittses) appeal from the district court’s denial of relief against Liddle & Moeller Construction, Mark “Virgil” Liddle, and Rick Moeller (collectively, Liddle & Moeller) and from the award of attorney fees to Liddle & Moeller.

I

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

The Frittses engaged Liddle & Moeller to serve as a general contractor in the construction of their custom built home. As a result of disputes arising during construction, the Frittses filed suit against Liddle & Moeller for damages and removal of a lien, alleging…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Eighteen Mile Ranch, LLC v. Nord Excavating & Paving, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Great Plains Equipment, Inc. v. Northwest Pipeline Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Ervin Construction Co. v. Van OrdenIdaho Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Gunter v. Murphy's Lounge, LLCIdaho Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Lexington Heights Development, LLC v. CrandlemireIdaho Supreme Court · 2004

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Carrillo v. BOISE TIRE CO., INC.Idaho Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Shore v. PetersonIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. Michael Eugene KochIdaho Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Printcraft Press, Inc. v. Sunnyside Park Utilities, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Lattin v. Adams CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 2010

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API