Missouri Pacific Railroad v. Bell
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Hart, J.,
(after stating the facts). It was the contention of the railroad company that it furnished a car with standard ventilation and kept it closed in the proper manner during the whole period while the potatoes were in its charge for transportation. Hence it contends that the freezing of the potatoes was caused by the act of God, or the inherent nature of the goods shipped.
Counsel for appellant then earnestly insist that the court erred in instructing the jury that the burden of proof in these respects was upon appellant.
We cannot agree with counsel in this contention. According to the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Sandberg v. McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. PapeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
- Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. WalkerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921
- Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Ry. Co. v. BurkholderSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
3Cited by6 opinions
- American Railway Express Co. v. H. Rouw Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
- American Railway Express Co. v. FegenbushSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
- Akerly v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1951
- Railway Express Agency, Inc. v. S. L. Robinson & Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
- St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. H. Rouw Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.