Zanski v. Yellow Cab & Baggage Co.
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtChappell, J.
This is a workmen’s compensation case. After hearing before one judge and a rehearing before the three judges of the compensation court, plaintiff’s case was dismissed, but he appealed to the district court and was granted an award. Defendant appeals to this court.
After careful consideration of the record we are of the opinion that the findings of fact made by the trial court are not conclusively supported by the record, and the ’cause is considered de novo as provided by section 48-174, Comp. St. Supp. 1941. See, also, Kucera v. Village of Prague, 141 Neb. 180, 3 N. W. (2d) 201.
It is…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Wilson v. Brown-McDonald Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1938
- Feeney v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1941
- McCall v. Hamilton County Farmers Telephone Ass'nNebraska Supreme Court · 1938
- Kaffenberger v. IversonNebraska Supreme Court · 1942
- Kucera v. Village of PragueNebraska Supreme Court · 1942
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hassmann v. City of BloomfieldNebraska Supreme Court · 1945
- Chambers v. Bilhorn, Bower & Peters, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1944
- Hammond v. Doctor's HospitalNebraska Supreme Court · 1945