Legal Opinion

Fischer Lime & Cement Co. v. Sorce

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided November 12, 1926PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHeiskell, J.

The parties will he referred to in this court as they appeared in the lower court, the plaintiff in error, there being the defendant, and the defendant in error, the plaintiff.

This is a suit brought by the plaintiff to recover of the defendant expenses for medical treatment and hospital bills incurred for his wife and minor daughter, and for the loss of their services. This suit was originally tried with two other suits, one on behalf of the same' plaintiff, for damages to his automobile, and tbe other suit being one by tbe minor daughter, Arnette Sorce, to recover for her own injury, but…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. City of Dallas v. MaxwellTexas Commission of Appeals · 1923
  2. Moody v. Gufl Refining Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Gardiner v. SolomonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  4. Flansburg v. . Town of ElbridgeNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
  5. Herr v. City of LebanonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry. v. HarrellCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1937
  2. Stafford v. Consolidated Bus Lines, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Quaker Oats Co. v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1949
  4. Dean v. Fineberg Packing Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1964
  5. Heun Kim v. State of TennesseeCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API