Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Burlington Northern Railroad

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 19, 1983No. 44977PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GAERTNER, Judge.

Defendant, Burlington Northern Railroad Company, appeals from the judgment entered in favor of plaintiff, Harold E. Anderson, in the sum of $1,067,000.

On May 6, 1977, plaintiff was an employee of defendant. His duties required him to ream bolt holes in the metal flooring of hopper cars. He used an air-powered reamer, the exhaust from which caused the metal shavings to be blown into his face at times. He was wearing safety glasses or spectacles but they did not prevent particles of metal from being blown into his eyes. There was conflicting evidence regarding the availability…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Kickham v. CarterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  2. Lee v. Baltimore Hotel Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1939
  3. Beggs v. Universal CIT Credit CorporationSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
  4. Piehler Ex Rel. Schultz v. Kansas City Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1948
  5. Reich v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1940

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Williams Ex Rel. Wilford v. Barnes HospitalSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
  2. Osborne v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Murray v. Farmers InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Schiles Ex Rel. Schiles v. SchaeferMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Wiedower v. ACF Industries, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1986

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API