Rye v. Chevrolet Motor Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBird, J.
This is a claim for an award under the workmen’s compensation act. An award of $1,400 was made by the department of labor and industry for the loss of an eye, and defendant reviews the same by certiorari in this court.
Plaintiff, 35 years of age, was employed as a foreman in defendant’s manufacturing plant. While attempting to separate two of his men, who were fight ing, plaintiff was struck and injured in the left eye. This resulted in a hemorrhage of the eye ball. Three days later the eye ball was removed. Plaintiff, as a result of the operation, was in the hospital for a time, and at the…
2Cited by13 opinions
- Blair v. Armour and CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1957
- Kraushar v. Cummins Construction Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1942
- Claim of Riegle v. FordonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
- McKenzie v. Gulf Hills Hotel, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1954
- Landry v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1970
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.