Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Roller

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 2017No. OSB 1406, 14142, 14143, 1537; SC S064359PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

In this lawyer disciplinary proceeding, the Oregon State Bar charged Dale Maximiliano Roller (the accused) with multiple violations of the Oregon Rules of Professional Conduct (RPC). A trial panel of the Disciplinary Board conducted a hearing, found that the accused had violated a number of those rules, and determined that the appropriate sanction was suspension from the bar for a period of four years. We affirm.

The charges arise out of three separate client matters. As to the first matter, the Bar alleged that the accused, in his representation of Gary R. Games, violated RPC 1.5(a)…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HartfieldOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of OhOregon Supreme Court · 2011

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re NisleyOregon Supreme Court · 2019
  2. In re KyleOregon Supreme Court · 2026
  3. In re KyleOregon Supreme Court · 2026
  4. In re RollerOregon Supreme Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API