Legal Opinion

Pollock v. Connecticut Fire Insurance

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 17, 1935No. Gen. No. 8,886PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Allaben

Dr. M. D. Pollock, the plaintiff appellant, owned certain premises in joint tenancy with his wife, they having received title thereto as such joint tenants on December 27,1922. A renewal fire insurance policy was issued to plaintiff appellant after the expiration of a prior policy. No application was made by plaintiff appellant for policies, no representations were made by him, and no questions were asked about the status of his title. The policy was made out to plaintiff appellant alone, was sent to him and he paid for it. Plaintiff appellant and his wife occupied the premises insured, as a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Capps v. National Union Fire InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Seaback v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Lawler v. ByrneIllinois Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Anderson v. AndersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Crikelair v. Citizens' InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1897

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Black v. Illinois Fair Plan AssociationAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  2. Howard Foundry Company, Plaintiff-Appellee-Appellant v. Hartford Fire Insurance Company, Defendants-Appellants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API