Legal Opinion
Pizzuti v. Metropolitan Transit Authority
New York Court of Appeals
Decided May 29, 1986PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The judgment of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
Petitioner brought this proceeding directly in the Appellate Division, pursuant to EDPL article 2, to challenge the taking of a 48-foot by 160-foot portion of his real property located in Bethpage, Long Island. The condemnation was made by respondent in connection with its project to electrify the main line of the Long Island Rail Road from Hicksville to Ronkonkoma. Insofar as here pertinent, the petition alleges that there has been a failure to comply with the State Environmental Quality…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Jackson v. New York State Urban Development Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Sandpiper Construction Co. v. SiegelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
3Cited by11 opinions
- Waldo's, Inc. v. Village of Johnson CityNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- East Thirteenth Street Community Ass'n v. New York State Urban Development Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Greenwich Associates v. Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Neptune Associates, Inc. v. Consolidated Edison Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- East Thirteenth Street Community Ass'n v. New York State Urban Development Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.