Legal Opinion

High Point Bank v. Morgan-Schultheiss, Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 15, 1977No. 7618SC857PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Judge.

It is apparent from the record that appellants have been represented throughout this litigation by a succession of attorneys. While each counsel undertaking to represent appellants has been able and competent, the entry and withdrawal of so many different attorneys would obviously account for the confused state of the record. It appears that counsel on appeal did not represent appellants until after the order of 2 August 1976 was entered but did prepare the last motion for extension of time, consolidation, and request for recommendation of the trial court to this Court.

We…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Smith v. BryantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  2. Robinson v. Willoughby.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1871
  3. O'Briant v. . LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  4. McKinley v. HinnantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  5. Ferguson v. . BlanchardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hodges v. HodgesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  2. Cornelius v. CorneliusCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  3. Hensgen v. HensgenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  4. Underwood v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  5. In re K.M.W.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API