Legal Opinion

People v. McCline

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 16, 1993No. Docket 94614PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Per curiam

Early in the defendant’s jury trial, before any testimony was taken, a new judge was substituted. The Court of Appeals found the substitution to be reversible error. Because the defendant was not prejudiced by this substitution, his conviction should not have been reversed. We vacate the judgment of the Court of Appeals and remand this case to the Court of Appeals for further consideration of the defendant’s remaining issues.

i

A jury' convicted the defendant of delivering more than 650 grams of cocaine.1 He is serving a life term of imprisonment.

This case was originally assigned to Macomb…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. MoskoMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Bellah v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1967
  3. Commonwealth v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  4. Durden v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  5. People v. PannellMichigan Supreme Court · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. People v. HawthorneMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Commonwealth v. CarterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
  3. National Waterworks, Inc v. International Fidelity & Surety, LtdMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. In Re OsborneMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  5. In re OsborneMichigan Supreme Court · 1999

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API