Jones v. Hayman
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
FUENTES, J.A.D.
This appeal requires us to consider under what circumstances a plaintiff, who brings an action pursuant to statutes containing fee-shifting provisions, may be deemed a prevailing party under the catalyst theory when the underlying action is dismissed as moot without a final judicial determination on the merits of the case.
Plaintiffs Kathleen Jones, Lakesha Jones, Sylvia Flynn, and Helen Ewell were four inmates initially confined in the Edna Mahan Correctional Facility (EMCF), an all-female penal facility. Following their transfer, along…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Crowe v. De GioiaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
- Mason v. City of HobokenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2008
- Furst v. Einstein Moomjy, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
- Furst v. Einstein Moomjy, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
- New Jerseyans for a Death Penalty Moratorium v. New Jersey Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Smith v. HUDSON COUNTY REGISTERNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2011
- Atiya Wahab v. State of New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
- DONALD NUCKEL VS. NEW JERSEY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (L-0001-17, MERCER COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2020
- MIKE ASSAD VS. ABSECON BOARD OF EDUCATION (L-0897-19, ATLANTIC COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2020
- NEW JERSEY LANDSCAPE CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION v. MAYOR OF THE TOWNSHIP OF MAPLEWOOD AND THE TOWNSHIP COMMITTEE OF THE TOWNSHIP OF MAPLEWOODDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2022