Legal Opinion

Miller v. Nacol

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 21, 1940No. 15072PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, Justice.

On November 4, 1948, appellee Adam Nacol entered into the following written agreement with appellant G. A. Miller, said agreement being the basis for this law suit:

“this serves as a puliminary agreement to a lease agreement between G. A. Miller lessee and Adam Nacol lessor at 1107 access road; and the 40' X 60' quonsit building *735together with the space and improvement between. The terms of this lease are agreed as ($185.00) one hundred eighty five dollars per month payable the 1st day of Jan. 1949 in advance and each month thereafter for a period of five years.
“It is agreed that…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hooks v. BridgewaterTexas Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Pickett v. BishopTexas Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. SettegastTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Johnson v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Ward Jr. v. EtierTexas Supreme Court · 1923

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Corrigan Dispatch Company v. Casa Guzman, S.A., Casa Guzman, S.A. v. Balzac Brothers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
  2. FOREST PARK LANES, LIMITED v. KeithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969
  3. Honolulu Oil Corp. v. Texas Pacific Coal & Oil Co.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1956
  4. Baines v. RayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
  5. O'Neal Furniture Co. v. Tyrrell-Wilson Investment Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API