Legal Opinion

Clarke v. Sherman

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 14, 1905Published

Appeal from Buchanan District Court.— Hon. A. S. Blair, Judge. Suit in equity to recover personal property, alleged to belong to the bankrupt estate of Eunice T. Barnett. Brom a judgment granting the plaintiff only a part of the relief asked, he appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtSherwin, C. J.

John Barnett and Eunice T. Barnett are husband and wife. John Barnett was adjudged a bankrupt on the 2d day of September, 1903, at which time *354Eunice T. Barnett held his note for $2,000 and interest, aggregating about $3,400. John Barnett owned a homestead worth from $2,'000 to $2,500, on which there was a mortgage of about $1,000 for a part of the purchase price théreof. Mrs. Bámett was a surety’ on a part of her husband’s indebtedness, and owned no property beside the note in question. After her husband had been adjudged a bankrupt, Mrs. Barnett became afraid that the homestead might be lost…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. O'Donnell v. SegarMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Adams v. BealeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1865
  3. First Nat. Bank v. GlassCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1897
  4. Jacoby v. Parkland Distilling Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  5. Mcclure v. BraniffSupreme Court of Iowa · 1888

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API