Legal Opinion

City of Tacoma v. Mundell

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 5, 1972No. 402-2PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPearson, J.

Defendant, Joseph Robert Mundell, appeals from a conviction for possession of a narcotic drug and possession of a dangerous drug. Both offenses were prosecuted as misdemeanors in municipal court, and later appealed to the Superior Court for Pierce County. A motion to suppress was denied in the superior court and defendant was found guilty.

Defendant contends that the trial court erred in not granting his motion to suppress certain evidence removed from his person. He bases this contention on three separate grounds: (1) The supporting affidavit was insufficient to establish probable cause for…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. United States v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. United States v. Di ReSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. State v. WalcottWashington Supreme Court · 1967

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. State v. HillWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. BroadnaxWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State v. NabarroHawaii Supreme Court · 1974
  4. State v. WithersCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972
  5. State v. OsborneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API