Legal Opinion

The PEOPLE v. Francisco

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 1970No. 42180PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Ward

The appellant, Arthur Francisco, having been convicted of the crime of gambling in the circuit court of Cook County, was placed on probation for two years and fined $90. Before trial he had moved to quash a search warrant which had authorized the search of his person and his auto, and to suppress certain evidence seized under the warrant. The motion claimed that the complaint upon which the search warrant was based did not set forth facts sufficient to show probable cause for issuance of the warrant. The trial court denied the motion and the appellant at trial was found guilty. His appeal to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. United States v. Thomas D. Clancy, James F. Prindable and Donald KastnerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1960
  4. The PEOPLE v. FioritoIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
  5. The People v. YorkIllinois Supreme Court · 1963

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. People v. FreeIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
  2. People v. StewartIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  3. The PEOPLE v. GeorgeIllinois Supreme Court · 1971
  4. People v. MiloneAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  5. The People v. PoeIllinois Supreme Court · 1971

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API