Legal Opinion

Legends are Forever, Inc. v. Nike, Inc.

District Court, N.D. New York

Decided September 30, 2014No. 3:12-CV-1495 (LEK/DEP)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDER

LAWRENCE E. KAHN, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff Legends are Forever, Inc. (“Plaintiff’ or “LAF”), commenced this trademark suit against Defendant Nike, Inc. (“Defendant” or “NIKE”), on September 27, 2012. Dkt. No. 1 (“Complaint”). Presently before the Court is Defendant’s Motion for summary judgment. Dkt. No. *20330 (“Motion”). For the following reasons, the Motion is granted.

II. FACTS1

A. Plaintiffs Business

Plaintiff is a baseball-themed souvenir shop located in Cooperstown, NY. Dkt. No. 32 (“Statement of Material Facts” or “SMF”) ¶ 1. Cooperstown is the home…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Carol A. Gallo v. Prudential Residential Services, Limited Partnership, Doing Business as Prudential Relocation ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. V.W. ex rel. Williams v. ConwayDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2017
  2. Knowles-Carter v. Feyonce, Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
  3. Rivera v. Rochester Genesee Regional Transportation AuthorityDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2015
  4. Hamilton International Ltd. v. Vortic LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2019
  5. Hamilton International Ltd. v. Vortic LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API