Legal Opinion

Fredburn Construction Corp. v. City of New York

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1937PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShientag, J.

This is a motion by the defendant for summary judgment upon the ground that the affirmative defenses interposed are sufficient in law and the answering affidavits raise no triable issues of fact.

The complaint alleges that on December 17,1929, plaintiff entered into a contract in writing for the erection of the foundation of the Brooklyn Public Library; that on or about June 1, 1930, the parties entered into certain other contracts for furnishing extra work such as beam pockets and rods for the sum of $3,065.52 and for additional steel sheet piling in excess of the quantity set forth in the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cauldwell-Wingate Company v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
  2. MacArthur Bros. Company v. . the City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  3. MacArthur Bros. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
  4. Allen v. . City of OneidaNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
  5. Cauldwell-Wingate Co. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Podzuweit v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1948
  2. Fredburn Construction Corp. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API