Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Ramiro Ibarra v. Rick Thaler, Director

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided July 18, 2013No. 11-70031Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partGraves, Circuit Judge

I agree that the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Trevino v. Thaler, 133 S.Ct. 1911 (2013), requires us to vacate our prior decision, grant Ibarra’s certificate of appealability (COA), and remand to the district court for the appropriate application of Martinez v. Ryan, — U.S. —, 132 S.Ct. 1309, 182 L.Ed.2d 272 (2012).2 The trial court should, in the first instance, be allowed to apply Martinez in accordance with Trevino. See Cantu v. Thaler, 682 F.3d 1053 (5th Cir.2012)

However, I disagree with the majority’s inclusion of the language that “in all other respects, the majority and dissenting…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Martinez v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  2. Trevino v. ThalerSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  3. Ramiro Ibarra v. Rick Thaler, DirectorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
  4. Ramiro Ibarra v. Rick Thaler, DirectorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
  5. Ivan Cantu v. Rick Thaler, DirectorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API