Legal Opinion
Roberts v. Heim
District Court, N.D. California
Decided March 8, 1990No. Nos. C-84-8069 TEH, C-87-6174 TEH and C-88-3373 TEHPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*432ORDER
THELTON E. HENDERSON, District Judge.
The recommendations of the Special Master are adopted in their entirety and the parties are ordered to comply with their terms.
RECOMMENDATION OF SPECIAL MASTER RE MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER ANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES
GERALD A. COHN, Special Master.
I
INTRODUCTION
This Recommendation deals with a motion by certain Defendants to compel Plaintiffs to provide further answers to interrogatories and a counter-motion by Plaintiffs to compel one of the moving Defendants, WERNER HEIM (“HEIM”), a Swiss national and resident to appear for deposition in the United…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Société Nationale Industrielle Aérospatiale v. United States District Court for the Southern District of IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- In Re Washington Public Power Supply System Securities LitigationDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1989
- United States v. Vetco Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Roberts v. HeimDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1987
- Roberts v. HeimDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Alfadda v. FennDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Custom Form Manufacturing, Inc. v. Omron Corp.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2000
- Schindler Elevator Corp. v. Otis Elevator Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2009
- Azarax, Inc. v. Wireless Communications Venture LLCDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2018
- Belparts Group, N.V. v. Belimo Holding, A.G.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2022
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.