Legal Opinion

Brown v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided December 21, 1990No. 90-155CPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

MOODY R. TIDWELL, III, Judge:

On October 29, 1990, the court dismissed this action with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b), for failure to prosecute in a timely manner. On December 3, 1990, plaintiffs filed a Motion For Reconsideration under Rules 59 and 83.2(f) of the United States Claims Court (RUSCC).1 After careful review of the facts, and the applicable Rules and case law, the court denies plaintiffs’ motion for the reasons stated below.

FACTS

Plaintiffs filed their complaint on February 16, 1990, seeking damages allegedly caused by the government’s breach of express and implied…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hafen v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
  2. Carpenter v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
  3. Lewis v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
  4. Barnes v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API