Legal Opinion

Phenix Insurance v. Covey

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided September 18, 1894No. 5827PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error from the district court of Lancaster county. Tried below before Hall, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Ryan, C.

On the 29th of January, 1890, Sarah J. Suddith and her husband made to Otto Covey a mortgage to secure payment of eight promissory notes for the aggregate amount of $1,685. On the 10th of February, following, the Phenix Insurance Company of Brooklyn, New York,issued its policy of insurance upon the mortgaged property to its owner, Sarah J. Suddith, containing a provision that “ loss, if any, payable to Otto Covey, mortgagee, as his interest may appear.” The building insured was wholly destroyed by fire February 18, 1890. The premium was not paid till after the fire, when, with full…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. German Insurance v. EddyNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Hughes v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Phenix Insurance v. DunganNebraska Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Modern Woodmen of America v. ColmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Western Nat. Ins. Co. v. MarshSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. German Insurance & Savings Institution v. KlineNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Eagle Fire Co. v. Globe Loan & Trust Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Home Fire Insurance v. Hammang Bros. & Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1895

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API