Legal Opinion

County of Oceana v. Supervisor of Hart

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 1882PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Mandamus.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

A mandamus is asked to compel respondent to levy and collect an amount of money deficient on the-tax of 1874, having been collected and not accounted for by a defaulting town treasurer. The matter involved is the same litigated in- Township of Hart v. Oceana County 44 Mich. 417, where it was held 'mczndmrms and not assumpsit was the proper remedy.

The sum in question, which is $1312.71, became delinquent in 1875, when it should have been paid by the treasurer to the proper county officer. A technical question is raised to the effect that the amount actually collected by the defaulter was less…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Attorney General v. SupervisorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Township of Hart v. County of OceanaMichigan Supreme Court · 1880

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Attorney General v. BruceMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Manistee & Grand Rapids Railroad v. Auditor GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  3. County of Ottawa v. City of HollandMichigan Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API