County of Oceana v. Supervisor of Hart
Michigan Supreme Court
Mandamus.
1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.
A mandamus is asked to compel respondent to levy and collect an amount of money deficient on the-tax of 1874, having been collected and not accounted for by a defaulting town treasurer. The matter involved is the same litigated in- Township of Hart v. Oceana County 44 Mich. 417, where it was held 'mczndmrms and not assumpsit was the proper remedy.
The sum in question, which is $1312.71, became delinquent in 1875, when it should have been paid by the treasurer to the proper county officer. A technical question is raised to the effect that the amount actually collected by the defaulter was less…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People ex rel. Attorney General v. SupervisorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
- Township of Hart v. County of OceanaMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
3Cited by3 opinions
- Attorney General v. BruceMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
- Manistee & Grand Rapids Railroad v. Auditor GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
- County of Ottawa v. City of HollandMichigan Supreme Court · 1934