Legal Opinion
Doe v. Salisbury University
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided June 2, 2015No. Civil No. JKB-14-3853PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
JAMES K. BREDAR, District Judge.
This action was brought by John Doe (“Plaintiff’) against Salisbury University (“SU”), Humberto Aristizabal,1 and John Doe Employees of SU (collectively named “Defendants”) alleging violations of Title IX, violations of the due process clause, breach of contract, liability under the doctrine of promissory estoppel, and seeking declaratory and injunctive relief. (ECF No. 1.) Now pending before the Court is Defendants’ motion to dismiss Plaintiffs complaint for failure to state a claim, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6).2 (ECF No.…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Doe v. Salisbury UniversityDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2015
- Doe v. Purdue UniversityDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2017
- Stennis v. Bowie State UniversityDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2017
- Yap v. Northwestern UniversityDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015
- Brad Hougham v. Trustees of Ithaca CollegeDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2026
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.