Legal Opinion
Metals Disintegrating Co. v. Reynolds Metals Co.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided May 18, 1951No. Civ. A. No. 1120PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEAHY, Chief Judge.
This is a patent infringement suit. After my earlier decision1 denying defendant '“Reynolds’ ” motion for summary judgment, • Reynolds filed an answer to the amended complaint in which five affirmative defenses are contained. Plaintiff “Metals Disintegrating” now moves to strike paragraphs 23 to 25 (the second affirmative defense) of the answer, “on the ground that the defense as stated is res adjudicata between the parties to this case by reason of the decision of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey * * * which decision was affirmed on appeal by…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Morton Salt Co. v. G. S. Suppiger Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- B. B. Chemical Co. v. EllisSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Reynolds Metals Co. v. Metals Disintegrating Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949
- Westinghouse Electric Corporation v. Bulldog Electric Products CoCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1950
- Campbell v. MuellerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1947
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Metals Disintegrating Co. v. Reynolds Metals Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1955
- Metals Disintegrating Co. v. Reynolds Metals Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1952