Legal Opinion

J.M. Huber Corp. v. Positive Action Tool of Ohio Co.

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided March 16, 1995No. Civ. A. H-93-2589PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS AND PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

STACY, United States Magistrate Judge.

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff J.M. Huber Corporation’s Motion for Partial Judgment and Partial Summary Judgment on Defendants’ counterclaim of unfair competition pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civfi Procedure. Instrument No. 34. Having considered the motion, the submissions of the parties, and the applicable law, the Magistrate Judge ORDERS that Plaintiff J.M. Huber Corporation’s Motion for…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Derrick Manufacturing Corp. v. Southwestern Wire Cloth, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API