Legal Opinion
United States v. Farmers State Bank
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided January 18, 1966No. Civ. 65-95SPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NICHOL, District Judge.
This case is before the court on plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction restraining the defendant Mittan-Peter-son Implement Company, hereinafter referred to as the Implement Company, from noticing for trial or pursuing its garnishment action in Circuit Court, San-born County, South Dakota, against the defendant Farmers State Bank and defendants LeRoy E. Duke and Rose Marie Duke.
From the affidavits submitted by both parties, it is apparent that the basic facts out of which this motion developed are uncontroverted. LeRoy E. Duke and his wife, Rose Marie Duke,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Minnesota v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- United States v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Leiter Minerals, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. Bank of New York & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Oklahoma Packing Co. v. Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. AugspurgerDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1978
- United States v. Pennsylvania Environmental Hearing BoardDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
- United States v. DorganDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 1974
- National Labor Relations Board v. Nash-Finch Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
- National Labor Relations Board v. Nash-Finch Company, D/B/A Jack and Jill Stores, National Labor Relations Board v. Nash-Finch Company, D/B/A Jack and Jill Stores, a Delaware Corporationauthorized to Do Business in the State of Nebraska v. Amalgamatedmeat Cutters & Butcher Workmen of North America, Afl-Cio, District Union 271,appellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970