Legal Opinion

Van Cortlandt v. New York Central Railroad

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1931PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorschauer, J.

The plaintiffs are heirs of the original patentee of the manor of Cortlandt, and own a parcel of land which may be roughly described as a rectangle, bounded on the west by the New York Central tracks, on the south by the Croton river, on the east by the Albany post road, which is carried over the Croton river by a bridge, and on the north by a road running from the Albany post road to Harmon station.

The nuisance complained of is the unauthorized and illegal *894maintenance by the defendant of a rigid railroad bridge across the Croton river which, the plaintiffs claim, effectually prevents the…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. The Daniel BallSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. United States v. Holt State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Penn Mutual Life Insurance v. AustinSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  4. New York City v. PineSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  5. Leovy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1900

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fairchild v. KraemerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960
  2. United States v. AMERICAN CYANAMID COMPANYDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1973
  3. Trustees of Southampton v. HeilnerNew York Supreme Court · 1975
  4. White Cap Sea Foods, Inc. v. PanznerNew York Supreme Court · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API