Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Murray

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided August 14, 1986PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

During an opening statement before a jury of six, defense counsel made remarks which provoked a motion for a mistrial. After consultation with counsel and exploration of alternatives,1 the trial judge declared a mistrial. Before the commencement of a second jury trial (the defendant had been found guilty at a bench trial), the defendant moved before another District Court judge for dismissal of the complaint on the ground of double jeopardy. That motion was allowed. Following Arizona v. Washington, 434 U.S. 497 (1978), Jones v. Commonwealth, 379 Mass. 607 (1980), and Lovett v. Commonwealth,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Commonwealth v. LewisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1963
  3. Commonwealth v. FazioMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  4. Jones v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  5. Commonwealth v. LudwigMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DelaneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  2. Commonwealth v. ThomasMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
  3. Commonwealth v. MahoneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
  4. Commonwealth v. Trung Chi TruongMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1993
  5. James L. Sneed Jr v. Hon Rodney Burress Judge, Bullitt Circuit CourtKentucky Supreme Court · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API