Legal Opinion

Ritchey Produce Co. v. State

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1999No. 97-2435PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.

As a preliminary matter, we note that appellee and amici raise a number of arguments that tend to confuse rather than to clarify the issues presented by this appeal. Therefore, it is necessary to dispel some of this confusion before proceeding to the primary issue raised in this appeal, to wit, whether Ohio’s MBE Program, as administratively applied and as written, violates the equal protection guarantees of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.3

I

In its brief, ODAS correctly notes that racial classifications of the type set forth in R.C. 122.71(E)(1) must be analyzed…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Regents of the University of California v. BakkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. PenaSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. City of Richmond v. J. A. Croson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Fullilove v. KlutznickSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Wygant v. Jackson Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. WellsOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Davis v. DavisOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Associated General Contractors of Ohio, Inc. v. DrabikCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
  4. Horne v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Rothe Development Corp. v. United States Department of DefenseDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1999

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API