Legal Opinion

Shumaker v. Bohrofen

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 24, 1933No. 41877PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEvans, J.

The question involved herein is whether the holder of a note against a ward under guardianship may sue out a writ of attachment and levy the same upon the real estate of a ward and' may thereby ignore the guardianship proceeding and the custodia legis. At the time the action was brought, one of the makers of the note, Peter Bohrofen, Sr., was a person of unsound mind and under guardianship. He was the owner of three farms, — one comprised 80 acres located in Dallas county; and another one of 160 acres in Greene; and a third one of 160 acres in Kossuth county. These farms were incumbered for a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bates v. DunhamSupreme Court of Iowa · 1882
  2. Martin & Bro. v. Davis & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1866
  3. Thode v. SpoffordSupreme Court of Iowa · 1884
  4. Pugh v. JonesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  5. Gressly v. Hamilton CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1907

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hopping v. HoppingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1943
  2. Carson, Pirie, Scott & Co. v. LongSupreme Court of Iowa · 1934
  3. Haradon v. Boardman & CartwrightSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940
  4. In Re Estate of SimpsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1938
  5. Northern Trust Co. v. BrandenbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API