Legal Opinion

Horlock v. Georgia Department of Human Resources

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided December 13, 1989No. 88-8611PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HILL, Senior Circuit Judge:

I. INTRODUCTION

Richard A. Fields and Sandra Watson, the individual defendants/appellants involved in the above-styled case, appeal the district court's denial of their motion for summary judgement on the basis of qualified immunity. As such, we review the district court’s decision on the basis of the facts viewed in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was sought, the plaintiff-appellee in this case.

Since we find that no issue of material fact exists that would preclude appellants’ entitlement to qualified immunity on the claim for a…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Adams v. LindseyDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1991
  2. 51 Fair empl.prac.cas. 962, 53 Fair empl.prac.cas. 304, 52 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 39,504, 52 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 39,728 Guydell Horlock v. Georgia Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API