Legal Opinion
Way v. Astrue
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided April 27, 2011No. C/A 1:10-1134-RBHPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
R. BRYAN HARWELL, District Judge.
The plaintiff, Eugene Way, brought this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g), and 1383(c)(3) to obtain judicial review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying his claim for Disability Insurance Benefits (DIB).
Scope of Review
The role of the federal judiciary in the administrative scheme established by the Social Security Act is a limited one. Section 405(g) of the Act provides: “[T]he findings of the Commissioner as to any fact, if supported by substantial evidence, shall be conclusive.... ” 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). “Substantial…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Bowen v. YuckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Christensen v. Harris CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Heckler v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Jackie L. HAYS, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis W. SULLIVAN, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Divito v. Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2021
- EVANS v. KIJAKAZIDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2024
- Johnson v. SaulDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2021
- Quattlebaum v. SaulDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2021
- Rondie B. v. Frank Bisignano, Commissioner, Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2026
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.