State v. Thomas
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
PREWITT, Judge.
Defendant was convicted of attempted rape and sentenced to fifteen years’ imprisonment. On appeal he contends that the trial court erred in not sustaining his motions for judgment of acquittal. Defendant asserts that as rape requires penetration “then it follows that attempted rape requires attempted sexual intercourse and attempted sexual intercourse requires attempted penetration.” He asserts that as the victim did not testify that penetration was attempted there was no attempted rape.
In reviewing to determine if a sub-missible case was made we accept as true all evidence…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. OldsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
- Laughlin v. ForgraveSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
- State v. HarveyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
- State v. RhodenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
- State v. SummersMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. MolaskySupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
- State v. BolenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
- State v. BonichMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
- Finley v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
- State v. KendusMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.