Legal Opinion

People v. Hana

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided August 31, 1994No. Docket Nos. 94542, 94877, 94878, (Calendar Nos. 3-4)PublishedCited by 103 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*331Griffin, J.

We have consolidated the appeals of these cases to consider related issues regarding the severance of trials of codefendants, in criminal cases. In People v Hana, we address the question whether the trial court should have granted defendant’s motion for severance in the context of the presentation of allegedly antagonistic defenses. In People v Rode and People v Gallina, the question presented is whether the dual-jury procedure utilized in these cases unduly prejudiced the defendants.

We hold, in line with MCL 768.5; MSA 28.1028 and MCR 6.121(D), that the decision to sever or join…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Richardson v. MarshSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Zafiro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Krulewitch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by103 opinions

  1. People v. GravesMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  2. People v. DuenazMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. People v. PipesMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
  4. People v. MitchellMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Roeur Van v. Kurt Jones, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007

98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API