Legal Opinion
Ex Parte Crow
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Decided November 23, 2005No. AP-75,176PublishedCited by 214 opinions
1Opinion of the Court 1
OPINION
2Opinion of the Court · KellerKeller, P.J.
The question in this case is whether an applicant must show prejudice to establish entitlement to an out-of-time petition for discretionary review (PDR) due to counsel’s failure to follow the requirements of Ex parte Wilson. 1 We hold that a limited showing of prejudice is required. Finding that applicant has made this limited showing, we grant relief.
I. BACKGROUND
Applicant was charged with the offense of aggravated robbery. He pled “not guilty” and was subsequently convicted. He appealed. Represented by counsel on appeal, applicant challenged the legal and factual sufficiency of the…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Roe v. Flores-OrtegaSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Ex Parte WilsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Hernandez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by214 opinions
- Ex Parte OwensCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006
- Ex Parte SantanaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
- Ex Parte Yekaterina Tanklevskaya, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2011
- Funk v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2006
- Ex Parte Richard Anthony Baldez, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2014
209 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.