Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Caldwell v. Commissioners of Wild Cat Drainage District

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 1899PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Writ of Error to the Circuit Court of Champaign county; the Hon. Francis M. Wright, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Carter

The State’s attorney of Champaign county, in the name of the People, on the relation of certain land owners feeling themselves aggrieved, filed an information in the nature of a quo warranto against the commissioners of the Wild Cat drainage district, and alleged that said commissioners, without warrant of law, did usurp and exercise jurisdiction over certain lands belonging to the relators, and did pretend to annex said lands to said district and to levy certain special assessments thereon for drainage purposes, and asked that said commissioners be required to show by what warrantor…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Cooney v. City of PeoriaIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  2. People v. Drainage Comrs.Illinois Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Gar Creek Drainage District v. WagnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Turley v. ArnoldIllinois Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Minnie Creek Drainage District v. StreeterIllinois Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Drainage Commissioners of District No. 1 of Young America v. Drainage Commissioners of District No. 7 of ShilohAppellate Court of Illinois · 1900
  5. Drainage Commissioners v. PonderIllinois Supreme Court · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API