Legal Opinion

Marshall-Wells Co. v. Hawley

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided August 4, 1942No. 223PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NORDBYE, District Judge.

Plaintiff seeks to obtain a declaratory-judgment declaring and determining that its two employees, Clyde Hawley and Walter Roginski, are-bona fide executives within the meaning of Section 13(a) (1) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C.A. § 213(a) (1), and within the meaning of Section 541.1 of the Regulations issued by the Administrator. Certain union officials are made parties hereto by reason of the fact that such union is the authorized collective bargaining agent for all of the employees in the departments where the defendants Hawley and Roginski are…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Fleming v. Hawkeye Pearl Button Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Smith v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1944
  2. Anderson v. Federal Cartridge CorporationDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1945
  3. Correa Torres v. Sociedad Mario Mercado e HijosSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1951
  4. Phillips v. Federal Cartridge CorporationDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1947
  5. Distelhorst v. Day & Zimmerman, Inc.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 1944

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API